Monday, November 26, 2012


Shervin

The Notorious GAO KOA
In Mandarin Chinese Gao Kao means the high (tall) exam. Gao Kao is another name for the national university entrance exam. Soon after graduating from high school students are required to take part in this exam to secure a place in any higher educational institution. The notorious Gao Kao was established in 1952. Although the goal of this two-day national exam was to allocate places for students in universities based on meritocracy in a fair way, the stress and the frustration spread by the exam have caused serious mental problems for many Chinese students. Besides health issues many critics also believe that this testing system causes students to suffer from lack of creativity since the test forces the students to engage in shear memorization.
University admissions in China are based entirely upon the Gao Kao score and that’s why this exam creates huge amount of pressure on both test takers and their parents.  To the average Chinese family, success of their children on the Gao Koa means receiving a degree from a top university and the likelihood of securing a college-level job in the competitive Chinese job market. A college-level job gives the students a better chance of obtaining higher social and financial status in the Chinese communist system. Each year more than 9 million students take Gao Kao. For most of them the exam is a combination of years of dedication to study and immolation of their personal lives (The Economist). They know that failure to do well in Gao Kao is equal to having no future in China. Accordingly, the Chinese educational system in high schools is designed solely to prepare the students for this exam. Therefore due to the intensity of competition students are drawn to rote memorization without even realizing the meaning or the application of what they are memorizing. In fact most of the students suffer from shear lack of creativity and critical thinking in high schools.
The pressure caused by the exam induces extensive anxiety and frustration leading to serious health issues in China. Although the number of enrollments at universities has increased in the last couple of years many high school students still suffer from severe anxiety; as a result some students are looking for professional help concerning how to overcome this psychological pressure. Wang Dong, who specializes in digestion disorders at the Shanghai Chang Hai Hospital, says that many young students are suffering from digestion disorders because of drinking too much tea and coffee so they can stay up late to do their homework and study for the exam. Some schoolgirls even ask the doctor for contraceptives to postpone their periods (gbtimes). Furthermore critics say although the numbers of admissions increases by almost 3% every year, only a very small percentage of elite students (less than 0.2%) are able to secure a spot in China’s top universities. Job opportunities for the graduate students of the top universities are not comparable to any other higher education institution in China therefore some parents also put extra pressure on their children to make sure that they do a good job on the exam( BBC News). Many Chinese families also tend to pay more attention to those children who do well in their studies and those children are usually the ones who get all the attention and support from their parents. For example in “One Amazing Thing” by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni we can see how education impact inequalities among children. Lily explains how her brother, Mark, used to get all the attention from their parents because he was so obedient and serious about his studies. Lily says: “My parents believed—and I secretly agreed—that Mark was the perfect child. In fact, he hardly seemed like a child at all.” (74) Therefore Lily tries to be just sufficiently disobedient to force her parents to notice her too. As soon as their parents figure that Lily has an outstanding talent in learning to play flute, she suddenly becomes the subject of much admiration at home and amazement at parties. However it is important to point out that even students who usually get high grades in high school may not be able to do very well at Gao Kao due to the heavy psychological stress caused by their parents.
Another major problem associated with this educational system is that many of the students dedicate most of their time in high school to studying and worrying about the exam so they hardly have enough time to be just like kids and as soon as get admitted to a university they forget how hard they have worked to achieve this spot. During all those years they have been told that actually the Gao Kao is the final step of their success and as soon as they get admitted everything is over and from that point on everything would be so easy then. As a result there are many young students who do not take the university seriously and despite all the achievements they had in the past they start to get lost in their own immaturity.
The opponents of Gao Kao also suggest that as well as causing massive psychological stress on young students the exam endorses shear rote memorization that lacks creativity. They believe the traditional educational system in China has deprived students from creativity. In fact in Chinese educational system creativity has been replaced by memorization, recitation and repetition. Chinese students are usually very good at memorizing and repetition but when it comes to creativity and imagination they usually confront many problems. The educational system in China is designed to program children from early ages to memorize answers and solutions therefore when they are faced with new problems they usually find it hard to come up with a solution of their own. In a survey done by the International Educational Progress Evaluation Organization in 2009, among 21 countries, the counting skill of Chinese children ranked first, while imagination ranked last and innovative skills ranked fifth from the bottom (People's Daily Online).
However the defenders of the Gao Kao believe that the exam is necessary to ensure that the most talented and elite students are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement. Moreover, the supporters emphasize that standardized testing allows students from poor areas to compete with wealthier students from urban areas in a fair way. However even the supporters of the Gao Kao admit that the stress involved is quite prevalent among the students especially in their last year of high school. Due to the stress of the test there are many smart and capable students who cannot do very well in the exam therefore they are forced to apply for lower level universities or even vocational colleges with poor educational system. As a result there is no doubt that the national university entrance exam besides robing young Chinese students of their curiosity, creativity, and childhood, generates massive amount of pressure on students that might eventually lead to many physical and psychological disorders.




Works Cited:
Clark, Taylor.  “Plight of the Little Emperors.” One World, Many Cultures. 8th ed. Stuart Hirschberg and Terry Hirschberg. Longman, 06 Jan. 2011.  42-48. Print.
Hanlu,Wang. “China's young students lack imagination, creativity.” People's Daily Online. 24 Nov. 2010. Web. 14 Nov. 2012
N, A .“Testing Times.” The Economist Shanghai. The Economist. 13 Jun. 2012. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.
N, A .“ Psychological stress before Gaokao.”  gbtimes. 06 Jun. 2012. Web. 14 Nov. 2012
Sudworth, John. "China's students take on tough Gaokao university entrance exam." BBC News. BBC. 8 Jun. 2012. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.













Sunday, November 11, 2012


Shervin

Rhetorical Analysis: China's students take on tough Gao kao university entrance exam


John Sudworth wrote an article entitled “China's students take on tough Gao kao university entrance exam" which was posted on BBC New website, in Shanghai China. The main goal of the article is to explain the problems associated with China’s national university entrance exam. I think the author wants the audience to realize that there is an intense competition going on in China in order to be admitted to a good university.  He asserts that:  “In fact, almost everyone - students, parents, teachers and policymakers - seems to accept that the system is squeezing creativity out of students.”
Sudworth uses different strategies to explain his ideas. For example he uses statistics to show that there are about 9 million Chinese students who take the Gao Kao every year but only a small percentage of them are admitted in China’s top universities. He also uses the different experiences of different people who have taken the Gao Kao to show the problems associated with the Gao Kao.

Sudworth, John. "China's students take on tough Gaokao university entrance exam." BBC News. BBC. 8 Jun. 2012. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.


Shervin
“Who can guess what had been in Nirmala’s mind when she started attending the class? It is possible that she longed for the education that birth had deprived her of. Can you blame her if, along the way, she fell in love with the way Ravi looked earnestly into her eyes as he urged her to remember the strange sounds of English, the shapes of its contorted letters? He was as close to a prince as anyone she knew. Aided by the romantic movies she had seen, she might naturally have cast herself in the role of the beggar maid whom he rescues. But all this is conjecture. The only thing we know for certain is what one of Mrs. Balan’s servants witnessed.”
In one amazing thing Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni tells the story of Nirmala and Ravi who are actually in love but because of lack of Nirmala’s education and difference in classes they were not able to get married. I think Divakaruni wanted the audience to realize the importance of education in India and show that many Indian people are deprived from education because of the class or the caste of the family that they are born in, therefore in future because of lack of education the will not be able to find a decent job or even a person from a different class to get married.
Divakaruni, Chitra. One Amazing thing. Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, 2009. Print.

Rhetorical Analysis



Vanessa
              

            Rhetorical Analysis One Amazing Thing

      In One Amazing thing, Author Chitra Divakaruni wrote about Lily and Mark to illustrate how the Chinese cultural embraces their beliefs on education and talents Chinese children have. I think the author was trying to demonstrate to the audience that the Chinese cultural has high standards for their children to be the best in whatever they do especially in their education. However, having high standards aren’t enough; children have to want to it as much as the children do.  In addition one tactic used to demonstrate this point was telling the story like a narrative as if lily was telling the story.  
        Divakaruni, Chitra. One Amazing thing. Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni, 2009. Print.

          Rhetorical Analysis In beyond Learning at School

            Author Wen Ma, In Beyond Learning at School: one Chinese Adolescent’s educational Journey, show that Chinese students are high achievers in short time amount of time because of how the Chinese people grew up. The Chinese learned and took philosophers, like Confucian, thoughts about the “learner” and the “learned”. The ides in which teacher take their role was learned and the students take their role as the learner to grasp everything the “learned” learned. I think the author was trying to educate the audience of why such people like the Chinese do what they do with their education. Their ability to grasp has been taught and learned decades ago. Additionally the author used logos, statistics to educate us about the Chinese.     
Ma, Wen. "Beyond Learning Literacy At School: One Chinese Adolescent's Educational     Journey." American Secondary Education 37.3 (2009): 52-69. Academic Search         Elite. Web. 6 Nov. 2012.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Rhetorical Analysis Assignment

Tariq Eloustaz
English 113b
Stacy Bieber
5 November 2012
Rhetorical Analysis Assignment

Srinivasan, Rajeev. "Latest India News India Breaking News." Rediff. N.p., 16 May 2012.
india/20120510.htm>.

This author wrote about how it is harder to get into school the testing schools after high school in India than getting into Stanford.

The author wrote on how much harder it is to get a seat in order to take tests in India in order to graduate or get into a college. He is showing us the difficulty Indian society has to move up.
.      
The Author would like us to realize how bad Indian education is and how unfair it can be. He is showing us that it is almost impossible to get an Education in India.

"That is part of the problem: There aren't sufficient numbers of seats in quality institutions, so that the acceptance rate for the IITs and IIMs is a paltry 0.1 to 0.2 per cent, compared to some of the toughest schools in the world to get into, such as Stanford, which may take 7 to 10 per cent of the applicants."

The author shows a great amount of statistics which is under the category of logos, example he shows the sad fact only .1 to .2 percent of applicants are accepted to take tests in order to get into a University, while one of the hardest University's in the world like Stanford accepts over 7 percent

Rhetorical Analysis

Vanessa
Rhetorical Analysis

 
To understand a piece of writing, it is important to understand its rhetorical situation. 

 1. Clark, Taylor. “Plight of the Little Emperors.” One World, Many Cultures. 8th ed.  Stuart Hirchberg and Terry Hirschberg. Longman, o6 Jan. 2011. 42-48. Print.

2.  The author wrote an article in a chapter in an anthology. The chapter was made to inform the public of United States to show how hard and how far the Chinese community goes in education. To show how extensive they go in there studies.

 
3. The author of this chapter wants to inform how the parents and the Chinese community put pressure on students to be competitive and top notch in their education.  

 
4.      “Across China, stories of parents going to incredible lengths to give their only children a competitive edge have become commonplace”. (Taylor 42)

 
5. The author of this article used Logos by giving statistics and appealing to logic. Another tactic used to persuade the audience was pathos was to tell different stories relating to how Chinese student endure while perusing high education.

 

 

 


Shervin


Rhetorical Analysis: Plight of the little emperors

Taylor Clark wrote an essay entitled “Plight of the Little Emperors " which was included on One World, Many Cultures, a textbook for college students in the United States. The main goal of the essay is to explain the problems associated with studying in China. I think the author wants the audience to realize that there is an intense competition going on in China in order to be admitted to a good university.  Students and their parents are all under huge amount of pressure to succeed in Gao Kao. Moreover he wants the audience to realize the importance of education in China. He also wants the audience to realize the pressure and frustration that causes mental-health crisis for young Chinese.
Clark uses different strategies to explain his ideas. For example he uses statistics to show that there are about 4 million university graduates  yearly but only less than half of this graduate students are able to find college-level jobs. Also he gives some data about the rate of suicides caused by the pressure and frustration among students. References to experts are another type of strategy used in the essay. He actually quotes from Vanessa Fong, a Harvard education professor and the author of “Only Hope: Coming of Age under China's One-Child Policy” to relate his essay to the One-Child Policy in China
Works Cited:
Clark, Taylor.  “Plight of the Little Emperors.” One World, Many Cultures. 8th ed. Stuart Hirschberg and Terry Hirschberg. Longman, 06 Jan. 2011.  42-48. Print.